source 2 - critics see 'chilling affect' in Alabma immigration law

 Briefly (2-3 sentences) summarize the article.

The article was about how the immgration law wants to make immgrants life as hard as possible. It was about how they want to pass laws to keep immgrants out of the school sysytem. the kicks part of this is that they want it to be all shady. They are lieing to people saying that immgrants can go to school but really they do not want immgrant children apart of our school system.

Explain the passage's CENTRAL ARGUMENT. What claims does the author make?

 The central argument is " The champions of alabama's far- reaching immgration law have said that it is in intended to drive illegal immigrants from the state by making every aspect of their life diffcult.But they have taken a very diferent tone when it comes to the part of the law concerning schools" the claim is that they are
saying something differnet about the schools. But is it the truth? that is the big question that the article is focusing on.

Find TWO ASSERTIONS that support the central argument. Explain how each assertion contributes to the author's main argument.

• " It is ,however , a first step in a larger and long- considerd strategy to topple a 29-year-old supreme court ruling that all children in the united states, regardless of their immigration status, are guaranteed a public education. It supports his claim because it shows that the issue has not just started but it has been going on for a very long time. It shows how the issue has been out in the open before but now it is trying to be covered up.