Summary # 1 In the " believing game" peter writes many claims that he says someone should believe in or agree with. I would like to argue that there are in fact many claims that i disagree with. For example he sates" you have to adopt the worldwideviews of others. Why is that nessary to make a good summary? He also states " you have to suspend your own beliefs tor a time to make a good summary". I believe that your own beliefs can make your summary better. I also disagree with the fact that that he says if you dont follow his "believing game" you will become the prey of something called the " closet chlche syndrome. I belive and encourge writers to not follow all peters rulues but to become your own writer that has your own writing game.
Summary #2 In the "beleving game " the author peter elbow states many different claims that help you make a great summary. He demostrats what you need to go into your summary and what you summary does not need to go into it. He gave great detail and great examples of a great summary. I think he showed you ways to write a great summary and he encourages you to put what u believe into your summary.
